Thursday, February 8, 2018

Euphemisms, Labeling, and Deceit--- More Tricks from Satan's Closet


By Anna Von Reitz

Today I sucked down my first cup of black coffee in an equally black mood. I hadn't slept well, my eyes were bleary. And here was my cheerful, chirpy husband already hard at work, with Sean Hannity's voice blaring on the radio. I don't have a whole lot of respect for Talk Radio personalities, because frankly, if a Great-Grandma in Big Lake, Alaska, has been able to learn what I have learned about the actual history of this country----how is it that Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Mark Levine don't know?
(A) They didn't ask. (B) They don't give a rat's pattutee.
In the first case, (A), if they didn't ask--- why not? I did. Seems obvious enough. Were they afraid to ask? Not intending to ask? Didn't know how to ask?
In the second case, (B), if you don't care about this country and its history and condition, how we got here and what it all means-- what are you doing on the radio spouting off about things that you don't understand and can't shed light on because you don't understand?
Logs in our eyes, indeed. Still, my husband listens faithfully to all sorts of news sources, including the aforesaid, so that's how I came to be hunched over my steaming cup of java sorta-kinda listening to Sean Hannity.
He was ranting about something important, albeit, failing to put it into context. He was talking about how the FBI goons deliberately changed the language they used to let Hillary off the hook with their pre-investigation exoneration letter.
Instead of describing her actions leaving Top Secret State Department documents on a private unsecured server as "gross negligence" --- which is the standard of the law allowing her to be prosecuted, the FBI sycophants deliberately described her actions as "extreme carelessness".
Please tell me the difference between "gross negligence" and "extreme carelessness"? The only difference, it turns out, is that one is actionable under the law and the other isn't.
So what if we call "murder" -- as in the case of LaVoy Finicum-- a "civilian casualty"? And we recast "ambush resulting in death" as "a failed arrest"?
It's the same difference as between "gross negligence" and "extreme carelessness". They amount to the same thing, but one is subject to prosecution under the law and the other is swept under the rug. Just based on words. Semantics. Lies. Half-truths. Spin. We are rummaging around in Satan's closet again.
After once reading the entire Internal Revenue Code and deciphering it, I have developed a honed ability to recognize deceptive language at a hundred paces--- and by far, the use of euphemisms to cloud or obscure the truth ranks first and foremost on the list of common sins. Dishonest language has become a plague.
We don't die anymore. We "pass on". We don't get pregnant. We are in "the family way". We don't lie. We "fib". We don't make war, we "defend"---unless of course, it is a euphemistic war like "the war on drugs". The weather isn't changeable, it's "partly cloudy". Dogs and cats aren't castrated. They are "neutered". We aren't grossly negligent. We are "extremely careless".
The dark side of this dishonest misuse of language becomes obvious when you consider the impact that deliberate mislabeling can have on us and our country---and not just its misuse in letting criminals escape justice.
You aren't an American. According to the Internal Revenue Code (written from the standpoint of the Federales) you are a "non-resident alien" (in the District of Columbia, that is). You aren't an American. You are a "U.S. Citizen" or a "US CITIZEN" or a "United States citizen" --- (and, nyah-nyah-nee-nyah-yah! -- we don't have to tell you which "US" or "U.S." or "United States" we are talking about at any given moment.) You aren't living here. You are "residing" here (according to THEM). You aren't an American. You are a "taxpayer" which equals "Withholding Agent" which equals a "Warrant Officer" in the Queen's Merchant Marine Service.
Who knew?
Do I look like a Warrant Officer in the Queen's Merchant Marine Service to you? Would I, in my right mind, ever claim to be a Warrant Officer in the Queen's Merchant Marine Service?
So I and millions of other Americans must be crazy and incompetent and need a lawyer to go to court and plead for us, because at one time or another we made the "mistake" of swearing under penalty of perjury that we were in fact Warrant Officers in the Queen's Merchant Marine Service.
We thought we knew what the words "Withholding Agent" meant, but in fact, the definition was carefully kept hidden, and we were left to assume our way to perdition.
Who knew that for "federal purposes" the word "person" has meant "corporation" for a hundred and fifty years?
That for "federal purposes" the words "state", "State", and "United States" have meant "District of Columbia Municipal Corporation" for nearly as long?
Let's try this out to find the real meaning: "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT" actually translates as "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISTRICT COURT". Ah, so.
Kinda puts an entirely different interpretation on things, doesn't it? How about "State of New Jersey"?
That translates as "District of Columbia Municipal Corporation of New Jersey".
I smelleth a rat, verily, a vermin of scaly tail and yellowed-teeth, a snot-gobbered foul brigand and cod-piece without merit. Or, to be more precise, I smell over 400 of them, all milling around and sweating under the Capitol Dome while their deceits pile up against them like so many piles of cow manure.
Sean Hannity was right to bring forward and comment on the deceit and ill-effect on justice that deliberately mislabeling "gross negligence" as "extreme carelessness" has, but he didn't go far enough. That's just one example, irking as it is---and the fact is that the same deliberate Satanic misuse of language has been employed to mis-characterize, defraud, disinherit, and prey upon this entire country and everyone in it.
If you want to look for examples of "Satanic Ritual Abuse" look no further than the most recent Webster's Dictionary or try reading any part of the Federal Code. They have murdered our language and ground it up and ate it like cannibals, drank its blood and meaning, all while smiling at you and criticizing you for not being "politically correct".

 ----------------------------
See this article and over 800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

6 comments:

  1. just some dude with dslFebruary 8, 2018 at 6:19 AM

    So this entire article is Anna doesnt think Hannity uses the right verbage because hes not as well informed as Anna... Wow the moral high ground of Alaskan logic...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very well put. The reason I have a hard time communicating with others! No reality check anymore and when confronted. I don"t understand or there is no talking to you. Now I am no word smith but do know when others want to change a leopard into a zebra. I am not the one lost in the meaning. It's an every day occurrence. I work in the private as in trade and even attorneys will sign a contract and find out that the only way is to pay or be liened.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's not that Hannity isn't using the right verbage, it's the disbelief that people can see part of the truth and not the whole truth! These people have been working and living the lie for 20yrs or more. How is it that Hannity, or any other news guy, didn't know (or suspect) FAKE NEWS? Why would ANYONE be surprised that the FBI, CIA, DOJ, DOD, DHS, IS GUILTY OF CRIMES AGAINST AMERICANS! The lie goes so far and so deep that I'm wondering who isn't in on it! Maybe we the cattle should start questioning where all this fair and balanced truth tellers were before President Trump. OH YEH, we are the crazy conspiracy theory folks. I say EVERYBODY SHOULD TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT ALL THINGS! Not MY moral high ground, just trying to change myself and point out that the answer to our problem is just as simple as changing our previous behavior! JMO

    ReplyDelete
  4. IT's not about high ground.
    Sorry you didn't see what she was really saying.
    Anna speaks on many levels, to explain them all will make someone say I'm off topic.

    To keep it as simple as I can, one of her messages in the article is 'they' use words to benefit them when they need it to benefit them, and 'they' use words to manipulate us, placing us in roles we did not consent to or agree to perform the obligations of, and we are held to the obligation in our lack of knowledge of what was done to us, and they are protected in their knowing what they are doing by changing the words to describe what happened.

    Murder is actionable and someone can go to jail or be sentenced to death for murder.

    If they change the action of murder to words like

    'stop living', it just appears your actions were an influence in someone else to make a decision stop living their life of their own free will.

    The play on words diminishes the full force of the activity when the background is unknown for them, and forces us into extreme compliance when the background is unknown for us.

    You have to have tested the matrix a few times in a few ways to have some of the other meanings / levels of information she disclosed.

    I am forgiving and tolerant of everyone, because awake call the people sheep/sheeple, and some who think they are awake are sleep walking, and some who think they are awake never left the comfort of their bed to find out what's going on, and some who think they are awake learn what they know from someone else's knowledge, and so on and so forth...

    Then there are the awake, who know, and show tolerance and lack of judgment for everyone because we really, really, know what's going on, and how the masses are used, even those that think they are awake, yet still end up participating in rituals and other observation activities that assist the ones they claim they don't want to assist.

    How many watched the SuperBowl for FOLO fear of being left out, and how many are tracking every negative thing that is being told on the internet.

    Your attention is important, your focus and energy given to what you are being told is important.
    Your anger is important, your sadness is important, your disgust is important, your strong desire to share it with others is important, your need to proliferate it and awake others to pay attention is important.

    All of you, in looking, noticing, repeating, sharing, waking up others to the info, having them watch, discussing, and all the emotions tied to it, is important.

    You help them...energy is energy....electricity doesn't care if it's created by sun, water, wind, urine, potato, it's energy.

    The system uses you in ways you have no idea, and collectively you help it, by watching everything it shows you. You have no indifference because you think your participation matters.

    If I was a vampire and needed your blood, I would pay wounded to get your sympathy so you'd donate your blood to me.

    Even the wounded are using you, the stories are to benefit them, they control everything you see and hear, like that Twilight Zone show would say.

    But I digressed. Anna communicates on multiple levels.
    Love to you, all One.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A very long reply that basically means THEY LIE!

      Delete
  5. just some dude with dslFebruary 9, 2018 at 3:25 AM

    We all communicate on multiple levels. Its all about the high ground when your discussing politics. See that comment can be taken multiple ways. Anna is a patriot, I will not bag on her for that. Sure shes got some damn good intel, and at the same time she cant get to the point without that little Alasken attitude. Her passive aggressive bias is what I think you mistake for her ability to communicate on multiple levels. I watched the Superbowl because that,s some damn good football! Of course I went to the bathroom during the timberlake occcult halftime show. FU don mischer! BTW both teams stood for the National Anthem, and you prob didnt see the Eagles head coach and star quarterback praise Jesus Christ on live TV! First words out of their mouth on live TV after the game! Yeah Im totally down with how are emotions are fueling the powers behind the curtian. I get that,,, and the TV show your trying to recall was called The Outer Limits... Love to you as well>>>>

    ReplyDelete